Review



recombinant human cd25 his tagged protein solution  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems recombinant human cd25 his tagged protein solution
    The structure and characterization of <t>CD25</t> aptamer. ( A ) The secondary structure of the CD25 aptamer was estimated by RNAstructure software v6.4 of Mathews Lab. The sequence of CD25 aptamer is shown with modifications indicated (Z, 5-[ N -(1-naphthylmethyl)carboxamide]-2′-deoxyuridine; N me , 2′- O -methyl nucleosides). ( B ) The binding affinity of CD25 aptamer to the CD25 recombinant protein was determined by the BLI method. Ni-NTA probes were immobilized with His-tag CD25 protein, followed by incubation with the aptamer 125 (green), 250 (yellow), or 500 nM (red). The binding signal over time is shown. Kd is expressed as mean ± SD. ( C ) The cells were stained with biotin-aptamer combined with NeutrAvidin DyLight 650 or APC-conjugated anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (mAb), and then the specificity of the antibody and the aptamer to the cells was examined by flow cytometry (control for aptamer: DyLight 650 only; control for antibody: not stained).
    Recombinant Human Cd25 His Tagged Protein Solution, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 3 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+human+cd25+his+tagged+protein+solution/Recombinant+Human+CD25%2FIL-2R+alpha+His-tag+Protein%2C+CF/pmc12944417-56-3-9
    Average 94 stars, based on 3 article reviews
    recombinant human cd25 his tagged protein solution - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "CD25-Targeted Aptamer–Drug Conjugate for the Treatment of CD25-Expressing Hematological Malignancies"

    Article Title: CD25-Targeted Aptamer–Drug Conjugate for the Treatment of CD25-Expressing Hematological Malignancies

    Journal: Pharmaceutics

    doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics18020217

    The structure and characterization of CD25 aptamer. ( A ) The secondary structure of the CD25 aptamer was estimated by RNAstructure software v6.4 of Mathews Lab. The sequence of CD25 aptamer is shown with modifications indicated (Z, 5-[ N -(1-naphthylmethyl)carboxamide]-2′-deoxyuridine; N me , 2′- O -methyl nucleosides). ( B ) The binding affinity of CD25 aptamer to the CD25 recombinant protein was determined by the BLI method. Ni-NTA probes were immobilized with His-tag CD25 protein, followed by incubation with the aptamer 125 (green), 250 (yellow), or 500 nM (red). The binding signal over time is shown. Kd is expressed as mean ± SD. ( C ) The cells were stained with biotin-aptamer combined with NeutrAvidin DyLight 650 or APC-conjugated anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (mAb), and then the specificity of the antibody and the aptamer to the cells was examined by flow cytometry (control for aptamer: DyLight 650 only; control for antibody: not stained).
    Figure Legend Snippet: The structure and characterization of CD25 aptamer. ( A ) The secondary structure of the CD25 aptamer was estimated by RNAstructure software v6.4 of Mathews Lab. The sequence of CD25 aptamer is shown with modifications indicated (Z, 5-[ N -(1-naphthylmethyl)carboxamide]-2′-deoxyuridine; N me , 2′- O -methyl nucleosides). ( B ) The binding affinity of CD25 aptamer to the CD25 recombinant protein was determined by the BLI method. Ni-NTA probes were immobilized with His-tag CD25 protein, followed by incubation with the aptamer 125 (green), 250 (yellow), or 500 nM (red). The binding signal over time is shown. Kd is expressed as mean ± SD. ( C ) The cells were stained with biotin-aptamer combined with NeutrAvidin DyLight 650 or APC-conjugated anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (mAb), and then the specificity of the antibody and the aptamer to the cells was examined by flow cytometry (control for aptamer: DyLight 650 only; control for antibody: not stained).

    Techniques Used: Software, Sequencing, Binding Assay, Recombinant, Incubation, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Control

    The CD25 aptamer specifically binds and internalizes into CD25-positive cells. ( A ) The cell internalization of Cy-5-labeled CD25 aptamer (red) was visualized for 0, 1, and 4 h using confocal fluorescence microscopy using CD25-positive Karpas299 and CD25-negative Daudi cell lines. The nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). ( B ) The rate of internalized CD25 aptamer was determined using the MFI value of flow cytometry analysis at 0 to 240 min. ( C ) Cellular trafficking of the CD25 aptamer. Fluorescence microscopy visualized the lysosomal delivery of pHrodo-labeled CD25 aptamer (red) for up to 4 h.
    Figure Legend Snippet: The CD25 aptamer specifically binds and internalizes into CD25-positive cells. ( A ) The cell internalization of Cy-5-labeled CD25 aptamer (red) was visualized for 0, 1, and 4 h using confocal fluorescence microscopy using CD25-positive Karpas299 and CD25-negative Daudi cell lines. The nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). ( B ) The rate of internalized CD25 aptamer was determined using the MFI value of flow cytometry analysis at 0 to 240 min. ( C ) Cellular trafficking of the CD25 aptamer. Fluorescence microscopy visualized the lysosomal delivery of pHrodo-labeled CD25 aptamer (red) for up to 4 h.

    Techniques Used: Labeling, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Staining, Flow Cytometry

    Effects of the CD25 aptamer on CD25/IL-2 signaling. ( A ) A competitive binding assay was performed by adding biotinylated IL-2 proteins to 96-well plates coated with CD25 proteins, in the presence or absence of the CD25 aptamer. ( B , C ) Karpas299 cells were pre-treated with the CD25 aptamer for 30 min, followed by stimulation with IL-2 for 15 min. The levels of pSTAT5 protein and TGF-β mRNA were analyzed by Western blotting and quantitative RT-PCR, respectively. ( D , E ) HuT78 cells were treated with IL-2 in the presence of either the CD25 aptamer or the anti-CD25 antibody Daclizumab. The expression of pSTAT5 was then assessed by Western blot analysis. ( F ) HuT78 cells were pre-treated with the indicated concentrations of the CD25 aptamer, stimulated with IL-2, and the secretion of IL-4 was measured as described in the Materials and Methods. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Effects of the CD25 aptamer on CD25/IL-2 signaling. ( A ) A competitive binding assay was performed by adding biotinylated IL-2 proteins to 96-well plates coated with CD25 proteins, in the presence or absence of the CD25 aptamer. ( B , C ) Karpas299 cells were pre-treated with the CD25 aptamer for 30 min, followed by stimulation with IL-2 for 15 min. The levels of pSTAT5 protein and TGF-β mRNA were analyzed by Western blotting and quantitative RT-PCR, respectively. ( D , E ) HuT78 cells were treated with IL-2 in the presence of either the CD25 aptamer or the anti-CD25 antibody Daclizumab. The expression of pSTAT5 was then assessed by Western blot analysis. ( F ) HuT78 cells were pre-treated with the indicated concentrations of the CD25 aptamer, stimulated with IL-2, and the secretion of IL-4 was measured as described in the Materials and Methods. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Competitive Binding Assay, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing

    In vitro cytotoxicity of CD25 aptamer–MMAE conjugates. Karpas299 and Daudi Cells were treated with CD25-ApDC MMAE1 ( A ) or CD25-ApDC MMAE3 ( B ) for 3 days, after which cell viability was assessed, as described in the Materials and Methods. ( C ) Karpas299 and HuT78 cells were co-cultured at a 1:1 ratio for 24 h, stained with anti-CD4 and anti-CD25 antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry. The co-cultured cells were subsequently incubated with 45 nM CD25-ApDC MMAE3 for 24, 48, or 72 h, and analyzed again using flow cytometry. ( D ) Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of MMAE or CD25-ApDC MMAE3 for 24 h. Western blot analysis of total PRAP, cleaved PARP, total caspase-3, and cleaved caspase-3 was performed. ( E ) The cell cycle was analyzed using flow cytometry after staining with PI. Results are expressed as mean ±SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: In vitro cytotoxicity of CD25 aptamer–MMAE conjugates. Karpas299 and Daudi Cells were treated with CD25-ApDC MMAE1 ( A ) or CD25-ApDC MMAE3 ( B ) for 3 days, after which cell viability was assessed, as described in the Materials and Methods. ( C ) Karpas299 and HuT78 cells were co-cultured at a 1:1 ratio for 24 h, stained with anti-CD4 and anti-CD25 antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry. The co-cultured cells were subsequently incubated with 45 nM CD25-ApDC MMAE3 for 24, 48, or 72 h, and analyzed again using flow cytometry. ( D ) Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of MMAE or CD25-ApDC MMAE3 for 24 h. Western blot analysis of total PRAP, cleaved PARP, total caspase-3, and cleaved caspase-3 was performed. ( E ) The cell cycle was analyzed using flow cytometry after staining with PI. Results are expressed as mean ±SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: In Vitro, Cell Culture, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Incubation, Western Blot

    In vivo antitumor efficacy of CD25 aptamer–MMAE conjugates in xenograft models. Tumor growth curves were generated by measuring tumor volumes in Karpas299 tumor-bearing mice following intravenous administration of CD25 aptamer–MMAE conjugates when tumors reached an average volume of 150 mm 3 . ( A ) Red arrows indicate the time points of injection with CD25-ApDC MMAE1 at doses of 1, 2, or 4 mg/kg. ( B ) Mice were treated either four times with 4 mg/kg (red arrows) or twice with 12 mg/kg (green arrows). ( C ) Tumor-bearing mice received a single dose of 0.4, 0.8, or 1.6 mg/kg, or were administered doses three times (once per week) with 0.8 or 1.6 mg/kg CD25-ApDC MMAE3 . Data are the mean tumor volume ±SE of eight animals per group. ( D ) NOD/SCID mice were systemically inoculated with Karpas299 cells and treated intravenously with the indicated dose of CD25-ApDC MMAE1 or CD25-ApDC MMAE3 twice per week for 3 weeks. Kaplan–Meier survival curves show the percentage of survival for each group, with statistical comparison performed using log-rank tests.
    Figure Legend Snippet: In vivo antitumor efficacy of CD25 aptamer–MMAE conjugates in xenograft models. Tumor growth curves were generated by measuring tumor volumes in Karpas299 tumor-bearing mice following intravenous administration of CD25 aptamer–MMAE conjugates when tumors reached an average volume of 150 mm 3 . ( A ) Red arrows indicate the time points of injection with CD25-ApDC MMAE1 at doses of 1, 2, or 4 mg/kg. ( B ) Mice were treated either four times with 4 mg/kg (red arrows) or twice with 12 mg/kg (green arrows). ( C ) Tumor-bearing mice received a single dose of 0.4, 0.8, or 1.6 mg/kg, or were administered doses three times (once per week) with 0.8 or 1.6 mg/kg CD25-ApDC MMAE3 . Data are the mean tumor volume ±SE of eight animals per group. ( D ) NOD/SCID mice were systemically inoculated with Karpas299 cells and treated intravenously with the indicated dose of CD25-ApDC MMAE1 or CD25-ApDC MMAE3 twice per week for 3 weeks. Kaplan–Meier survival curves show the percentage of survival for each group, with statistical comparison performed using log-rank tests.

    Techniques Used: In Vivo, Generated, Injection, Comparison



    Similar Products

    94
    R&D Systems recombinant human cd25 his tagged protein solution
    The structure and characterization of <t>CD25</t> aptamer. ( A ) The secondary structure of the CD25 aptamer was estimated by RNAstructure software v6.4 of Mathews Lab. The sequence of CD25 aptamer is shown with modifications indicated (Z, 5-[ N -(1-naphthylmethyl)carboxamide]-2′-deoxyuridine; N me , 2′- O -methyl nucleosides). ( B ) The binding affinity of CD25 aptamer to the CD25 recombinant protein was determined by the BLI method. Ni-NTA probes were immobilized with His-tag CD25 protein, followed by incubation with the aptamer 125 (green), 250 (yellow), or 500 nM (red). The binding signal over time is shown. Kd is expressed as mean ± SD. ( C ) The cells were stained with biotin-aptamer combined with NeutrAvidin DyLight 650 or APC-conjugated anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (mAb), and then the specificity of the antibody and the aptamer to the cells was examined by flow cytometry (control for aptamer: DyLight 650 only; control for antibody: not stained).
    Recombinant Human Cd25 His Tagged Protein Solution, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+human+cd25+his+tagged+protein+solution/Recombinant+Human+CD25%2FIL-2R+alpha+His-tag+Protein%2C+CF/pmc12944417-56-3-9
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human cd25 his tagged protein solution - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    The structure and characterization of CD25 aptamer. ( A ) The secondary structure of the CD25 aptamer was estimated by RNAstructure software v6.4 of Mathews Lab. The sequence of CD25 aptamer is shown with modifications indicated (Z, 5-[ N -(1-naphthylmethyl)carboxamide]-2′-deoxyuridine; N me , 2′- O -methyl nucleosides). ( B ) The binding affinity of CD25 aptamer to the CD25 recombinant protein was determined by the BLI method. Ni-NTA probes were immobilized with His-tag CD25 protein, followed by incubation with the aptamer 125 (green), 250 (yellow), or 500 nM (red). The binding signal over time is shown. Kd is expressed as mean ± SD. ( C ) The cells were stained with biotin-aptamer combined with NeutrAvidin DyLight 650 or APC-conjugated anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (mAb), and then the specificity of the antibody and the aptamer to the cells was examined by flow cytometry (control for aptamer: DyLight 650 only; control for antibody: not stained).

    Journal: Pharmaceutics

    Article Title: CD25-Targeted Aptamer–Drug Conjugate for the Treatment of CD25-Expressing Hematological Malignancies

    doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics18020217

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The structure and characterization of CD25 aptamer. ( A ) The secondary structure of the CD25 aptamer was estimated by RNAstructure software v6.4 of Mathews Lab. The sequence of CD25 aptamer is shown with modifications indicated (Z, 5-[ N -(1-naphthylmethyl)carboxamide]-2′-deoxyuridine; N me , 2′- O -methyl nucleosides). ( B ) The binding affinity of CD25 aptamer to the CD25 recombinant protein was determined by the BLI method. Ni-NTA probes were immobilized with His-tag CD25 protein, followed by incubation with the aptamer 125 (green), 250 (yellow), or 500 nM (red). The binding signal over time is shown. Kd is expressed as mean ± SD. ( C ) The cells were stained with biotin-aptamer combined with NeutrAvidin DyLight 650 or APC-conjugated anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (mAb), and then the specificity of the antibody and the aptamer to the cells was examined by flow cytometry (control for aptamer: DyLight 650 only; control for antibody: not stained).

    Article Snippet: A 5 μg/mL recombinant human CD25 His-tagged protein solution (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was immobilized onto Ni-NTA probes (Gator Bio).

    Techniques: Software, Sequencing, Binding Assay, Recombinant, Incubation, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Control

    The CD25 aptamer specifically binds and internalizes into CD25-positive cells. ( A ) The cell internalization of Cy-5-labeled CD25 aptamer (red) was visualized for 0, 1, and 4 h using confocal fluorescence microscopy using CD25-positive Karpas299 and CD25-negative Daudi cell lines. The nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). ( B ) The rate of internalized CD25 aptamer was determined using the MFI value of flow cytometry analysis at 0 to 240 min. ( C ) Cellular trafficking of the CD25 aptamer. Fluorescence microscopy visualized the lysosomal delivery of pHrodo-labeled CD25 aptamer (red) for up to 4 h.

    Journal: Pharmaceutics

    Article Title: CD25-Targeted Aptamer–Drug Conjugate for the Treatment of CD25-Expressing Hematological Malignancies

    doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics18020217

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The CD25 aptamer specifically binds and internalizes into CD25-positive cells. ( A ) The cell internalization of Cy-5-labeled CD25 aptamer (red) was visualized for 0, 1, and 4 h using confocal fluorescence microscopy using CD25-positive Karpas299 and CD25-negative Daudi cell lines. The nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). ( B ) The rate of internalized CD25 aptamer was determined using the MFI value of flow cytometry analysis at 0 to 240 min. ( C ) Cellular trafficking of the CD25 aptamer. Fluorescence microscopy visualized the lysosomal delivery of pHrodo-labeled CD25 aptamer (red) for up to 4 h.

    Article Snippet: A 5 μg/mL recombinant human CD25 His-tagged protein solution (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was immobilized onto Ni-NTA probes (Gator Bio).

    Techniques: Labeling, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Staining, Flow Cytometry

    Effects of the CD25 aptamer on CD25/IL-2 signaling. ( A ) A competitive binding assay was performed by adding biotinylated IL-2 proteins to 96-well plates coated with CD25 proteins, in the presence or absence of the CD25 aptamer. ( B , C ) Karpas299 cells were pre-treated with the CD25 aptamer for 30 min, followed by stimulation with IL-2 for 15 min. The levels of pSTAT5 protein and TGF-β mRNA were analyzed by Western blotting and quantitative RT-PCR, respectively. ( D , E ) HuT78 cells were treated with IL-2 in the presence of either the CD25 aptamer or the anti-CD25 antibody Daclizumab. The expression of pSTAT5 was then assessed by Western blot analysis. ( F ) HuT78 cells were pre-treated with the indicated concentrations of the CD25 aptamer, stimulated with IL-2, and the secretion of IL-4 was measured as described in the Materials and Methods. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Journal: Pharmaceutics

    Article Title: CD25-Targeted Aptamer–Drug Conjugate for the Treatment of CD25-Expressing Hematological Malignancies

    doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics18020217

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of the CD25 aptamer on CD25/IL-2 signaling. ( A ) A competitive binding assay was performed by adding biotinylated IL-2 proteins to 96-well plates coated with CD25 proteins, in the presence or absence of the CD25 aptamer. ( B , C ) Karpas299 cells were pre-treated with the CD25 aptamer for 30 min, followed by stimulation with IL-2 for 15 min. The levels of pSTAT5 protein and TGF-β mRNA were analyzed by Western blotting and quantitative RT-PCR, respectively. ( D , E ) HuT78 cells were treated with IL-2 in the presence of either the CD25 aptamer or the anti-CD25 antibody Daclizumab. The expression of pSTAT5 was then assessed by Western blot analysis. ( F ) HuT78 cells were pre-treated with the indicated concentrations of the CD25 aptamer, stimulated with IL-2, and the secretion of IL-4 was measured as described in the Materials and Methods. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: A 5 μg/mL recombinant human CD25 His-tagged protein solution (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was immobilized onto Ni-NTA probes (Gator Bio).

    Techniques: Competitive Binding Assay, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing

    In vitro cytotoxicity of CD25 aptamer–MMAE conjugates. Karpas299 and Daudi Cells were treated with CD25-ApDC MMAE1 ( A ) or CD25-ApDC MMAE3 ( B ) for 3 days, after which cell viability was assessed, as described in the Materials and Methods. ( C ) Karpas299 and HuT78 cells were co-cultured at a 1:1 ratio for 24 h, stained with anti-CD4 and anti-CD25 antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry. The co-cultured cells were subsequently incubated with 45 nM CD25-ApDC MMAE3 for 24, 48, or 72 h, and analyzed again using flow cytometry. ( D ) Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of MMAE or CD25-ApDC MMAE3 for 24 h. Western blot analysis of total PRAP, cleaved PARP, total caspase-3, and cleaved caspase-3 was performed. ( E ) The cell cycle was analyzed using flow cytometry after staining with PI. Results are expressed as mean ±SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.

    Journal: Pharmaceutics

    Article Title: CD25-Targeted Aptamer–Drug Conjugate for the Treatment of CD25-Expressing Hematological Malignancies

    doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics18020217

    Figure Lengend Snippet: In vitro cytotoxicity of CD25 aptamer–MMAE conjugates. Karpas299 and Daudi Cells were treated with CD25-ApDC MMAE1 ( A ) or CD25-ApDC MMAE3 ( B ) for 3 days, after which cell viability was assessed, as described in the Materials and Methods. ( C ) Karpas299 and HuT78 cells were co-cultured at a 1:1 ratio for 24 h, stained with anti-CD4 and anti-CD25 antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry. The co-cultured cells were subsequently incubated with 45 nM CD25-ApDC MMAE3 for 24, 48, or 72 h, and analyzed again using flow cytometry. ( D ) Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of MMAE or CD25-ApDC MMAE3 for 24 h. Western blot analysis of total PRAP, cleaved PARP, total caspase-3, and cleaved caspase-3 was performed. ( E ) The cell cycle was analyzed using flow cytometry after staining with PI. Results are expressed as mean ±SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: A 5 μg/mL recombinant human CD25 His-tagged protein solution (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was immobilized onto Ni-NTA probes (Gator Bio).

    Techniques: In Vitro, Cell Culture, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Incubation, Western Blot

    In vivo antitumor efficacy of CD25 aptamer–MMAE conjugates in xenograft models. Tumor growth curves were generated by measuring tumor volumes in Karpas299 tumor-bearing mice following intravenous administration of CD25 aptamer–MMAE conjugates when tumors reached an average volume of 150 mm 3 . ( A ) Red arrows indicate the time points of injection with CD25-ApDC MMAE1 at doses of 1, 2, or 4 mg/kg. ( B ) Mice were treated either four times with 4 mg/kg (red arrows) or twice with 12 mg/kg (green arrows). ( C ) Tumor-bearing mice received a single dose of 0.4, 0.8, or 1.6 mg/kg, or were administered doses three times (once per week) with 0.8 or 1.6 mg/kg CD25-ApDC MMAE3 . Data are the mean tumor volume ±SE of eight animals per group. ( D ) NOD/SCID mice were systemically inoculated with Karpas299 cells and treated intravenously with the indicated dose of CD25-ApDC MMAE1 or CD25-ApDC MMAE3 twice per week for 3 weeks. Kaplan–Meier survival curves show the percentage of survival for each group, with statistical comparison performed using log-rank tests.

    Journal: Pharmaceutics

    Article Title: CD25-Targeted Aptamer–Drug Conjugate for the Treatment of CD25-Expressing Hematological Malignancies

    doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics18020217

    Figure Lengend Snippet: In vivo antitumor efficacy of CD25 aptamer–MMAE conjugates in xenograft models. Tumor growth curves were generated by measuring tumor volumes in Karpas299 tumor-bearing mice following intravenous administration of CD25 aptamer–MMAE conjugates when tumors reached an average volume of 150 mm 3 . ( A ) Red arrows indicate the time points of injection with CD25-ApDC MMAE1 at doses of 1, 2, or 4 mg/kg. ( B ) Mice were treated either four times with 4 mg/kg (red arrows) or twice with 12 mg/kg (green arrows). ( C ) Tumor-bearing mice received a single dose of 0.4, 0.8, or 1.6 mg/kg, or were administered doses three times (once per week) with 0.8 or 1.6 mg/kg CD25-ApDC MMAE3 . Data are the mean tumor volume ±SE of eight animals per group. ( D ) NOD/SCID mice were systemically inoculated with Karpas299 cells and treated intravenously with the indicated dose of CD25-ApDC MMAE1 or CD25-ApDC MMAE3 twice per week for 3 weeks. Kaplan–Meier survival curves show the percentage of survival for each group, with statistical comparison performed using log-rank tests.

    Article Snippet: A 5 μg/mL recombinant human CD25 His-tagged protein solution (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was immobilized onto Ni-NTA probes (Gator Bio).

    Techniques: In Vivo, Generated, Injection, Comparison